Critical Issues Home About Us Blog Site Map Demographics Jobs Newsletter Contact

New!

Check us out on Facebook

Google

 

Employment Discrimination against African, Hispanic, and Asian Americans

From the Blog

While the election of Barack Obama has signaled a more liberal attitude towards diversity in politics by the American public, we shouldn’t forget that the Supreme Court still has considerable authority over race relations through its case decisions. Here the Bush legacy lives on in the form of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito. Their appointments by Obama’s predecessor have turned the court far to the conservative side and their opinions thus far on race issues have not been encouraging.

This session the court will take on four significant civil rights cases.

The most high-profile case involves a promotions test for New Hampshire firefighters the results of which were set aside because no African Americans and only one Hispanic American passed. The firefighters who passed the test are suing to eliminate any diversity considerations from the promotion eligibility process.

There is also a challenge to the Voting Rights Act that questions Congress’ authority to enforce voting rights at the State and local level, an English-only case in Arizona public schools, and discriminatory lending case in New York.

The conservative leanings of the court already do not create an optimistic view toward potential rulings, but it seems that the country is in a different place on race relations since Obama’s election. The election of the first African American President has created an “anything is possible” attitude, in spite of a worsening economy, two wars raging on, and fragile international relations.

With all of these problems and a black man as President, are race relations even an issue? Stay tuned to see how the Supreme Court gives its two cents.

For more information, see related stories in the USA Today and Washington Post.

More Blog stories

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against individuals on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability.

What constitutes employment discrimination? 

According to Title VII, an employer may not:

  • "fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin"

  • "limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin"

  • "discriminate against any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training"

Simply stated, this says that an employer may not discriminate against individuals when it comes to hiring, firing, promotions, pay, training, or other workplace conditions.   Title VII also includes unlawful employment practices by labor unions and employment agencies.  Click here for more details on discriminatory practices.

Discrimination claims are handled by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency responsible for promoting equal opportunity in the workplace and enforcing Title VII.  If you feel that you have been discriminated against by your employer, labor union, or employment agency, click here for instructions on how to file a claim with the EEOC.

Workplace  Discrimination News

Click here for the latest Job Discrimination news

Topics

Discriminated against at work?
Click here to file an employment discrimination claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Frequently asked questions about workplace discrimination
FAQ's answered about employment discrimination laws by the U.S. Department of Justice
Resources
Minority owned law firms specializing in employment law

Alvarado Smith & Sanchez - Irvine, California

Minami, Lew, & Tamaki - San Francisco, California

Vakili & Leus - Los Angeles, California

Wilson, Petty, Kosmo & Turner - San Diego, California

Greene and Letts - Chicago, Illinois

McKenzie & Edwards - Boston, Massachusetts

Blackwell Igbanugo Engen & Saffold - Minneapolis, Minnesota

Wong Fleming - Princeton, New Jersey

Goldman Antonetti & Cordova - San Juan, Puerto Rico

Patrick Henry Cappell & Lewis - Alexandria, Virginia

Gonzalez, Saggio, & Harlan - Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Additional links
FindLaw - referrals to attorneys.  Search under "discrimination" or "employment law"
Home About Us Site Map Blog Jobs Newsletter Demographics Contact
Business Politics Civil Rights Media/Entertainment Workplace Consumer Housing Healthcare Education

Questions, comments, feedback?  Send email to:  Webmaster@EthnicMajority.com

Get Acrobat Reader   Copyright 2009 Diverse Strategies Inc.