|
|
|
Employment
Discrimination against African, Hispanic, and Asian Americans |
|
From the Blog While the
election of Barack Obama has signaled a more liberal
attitude towards diversity in politics by the American
public, we shouldn’t forget that the Supreme Court still has
considerable authority over race relations through its case
decisions. Here the Bush legacy lives on in the form of
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito. Their
appointments by Obama’s predecessor have turned the court
far to the conservative side and their opinions thus far on
race issues have not been encouraging.
This session the court will take on four significant
civil rights cases.
The most high-profile case involves a promotions test for
New Hampshire firefighters the results of which were set
aside because no African Americans and only one Hispanic
American passed. The firefighters who passed the test are
suing to eliminate any diversity considerations from the
promotion eligibility process.
There is also a challenge to the Voting Rights Act that
questions Congress’ authority to enforce voting rights at
the State and local level, an English-only case in Arizona
public schools, and discriminatory lending case in New York.
The conservative leanings of the court already do not
create an optimistic view toward potential rulings, but it
seems that the country is in a different place on race
relations since Obama’s election. The election of the first
African American President has created an “anything is
possible” attitude, in spite of a worsening economy, two
wars raging on, and fragile international relations.
With all of these problems and a black man as President,
are race relations even an issue? Stay tuned to see how the
Supreme Court gives its two cents.
For more information, see related stories in the
USA Today and
Washington Post.
More
Blog
stories |
|
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against
individuals on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability.
What constitutes employment discrimination?
According to Title VII, an employer may not:
-
"fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to
discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions,
or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin"
-
"limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any
way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or
otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin"
-
"discriminate against any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide
apprenticeship or other training"
Simply stated, this says that an employer may not discriminate against individuals when
it comes to hiring, firing, promotions, pay, training, or other workplace conditions.
Title VII also includes unlawful employment practices by labor unions and
employment agencies.
Click here for
more details on discriminatory practices.
Discrimination claims are handled by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC), a federal agency responsible for promoting equal opportunity in the workplace and
enforcing Title VII. If you feel that you have been discriminated against by your
employer, labor union, or employment agency,
click here for instructions on how to file
a claim with the EEOC. |
|
|
 |
|
Workplace
Discrimination News |
|
Click here for the latest Job
Discrimination news |
|
Topics |
|
Discriminated against
at work? |
|
Click here
to file an employment
discrimination claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) |
|
Frequently asked
questions about workplace discrimination |
|
FAQ's answered about
employment discrimination laws by the
U.S. Department of Justice |
|
Resources |
|
Minority owned law
firms specializing in employment law |
|
Alvarado Smith & Sanchez
- Irvine, California
Minami, Lew, & Tamaki - San
Francisco, California
Vakili & Leus
- Los Angeles, California
Wilson, Petty, Kosmo & Turner - San Diego, California
Greene and Letts
- Chicago, Illinois
McKenzie & Edwards
- Boston, Massachusetts
Blackwell Igbanugo Engen & Saffold - Minneapolis, Minnesota
Wong Fleming
- Princeton, New Jersey
Goldman Antonetti
& Cordova
- San Juan, Puerto Rico
Patrick Henry Cappell
& Lewis - Alexandria, Virginia
Gonzalez, Saggio, & Harlan
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
|
|
Additional links |
|
FindLaw - referrals to attorneys.
Search under "discrimination" or "employment law" |
|
|